|
The enormous task of associating various SNP panels to a
specific disease presents tremendous challenge to technologies
in SNP screening. Various assays have been developed for detection
of known and unknown SNPs. Many commercial products are available
as well. Some are relatively easy to do and low in cost. Others
are developed for high volume screening at considerable cost.
One must remember that there is hardly one protocol that meets
all research needs. Very often, different protocols are utilized
in a single core genotyping lab to provide flexibility, and
accurate validation.
Majority of SNP genotyping assays can be separated into four
groups based on molecular mechanisms.
Also known as ASO (allele specific oligonucleotide hybridization),
this protocol relies on distinguishing between two DNA molecules
differing by one base by hybridization. Fluorescence labeled
PCR fragments are applied to immobilized oligonucleotides
representing SNP sequences. After stringent hybridization
and washing conditions, fluorescence intensity is measured
for each SNP oligonucleotide.
^ Back to Top
In the single base extension approach, the target region
is amplified by PCR followed by a single base sequencing reaction
using a primer that anneals one base shy of the polymorphic
site. Several detection methods have been described. One can
label the primer and apply the extension products to gel electrophoresis.
Or the single base extension product can be broken down into
smaller pieces and measured by Mass Spectrometry. The most
popular detection method involves fluorescence labeled, dideoxynucleotide
terminators that stop the chain extension.
Primer Extensions with Terminators
Allele-Specific Primer Extensions
^ Back to Top
By designing oligonucleotides complementary to the target
sequence, with the allele-specific base at its 3'-end or 5-'end,
one can determine the genotype of the PCR amplified target
sequence by determining whether an oligonucleotide complementary
to the DNA sequencing adjoining the polymorphic site is ligated
to the allele-specific oligonucleotide or not.
^ Back to Top
Sequencing is the procedure of choice for SNP discovery.
The most common forms of sequencing are based on primer
extension using either a) dye-primers and unlabeled terminators
or b) unlabeled primers and dye-terminators. The products
of the reaction are then separated using electrophoresis
using either capillary electrophoresis or slab gels.
^ Back to Top
Before one decides on a particular protocol to use for SNP
typing, one has to consider the following factors:
1. Scope of genotyping. This would include the # of SNPs
to be screened, and # of samples to be tested, as well as
how many genotyping projects are conducted at the same time.
This will help determine if one needs a higher throughput
format with relative ease to switch from one project to another.
2. Level of molecular biology expertise in the lab. Some
assays are relatively simple to set up and perform, while
others require considerable amount of experience in assay
optimization and software support.
3. Funding for capital instrument. Capital investment for
commercial SNP platforms can range from $30K to over $500K.
Typically expensive sample processing automation is included
in the high capital investment.
4. Consumable cost. Cost for consumables (reagents, plates,
and pipett tips, etc) range from $0.20 to $5.00 per genotyping.
This may not sound like a lot. However, when the project involves
screening 1000 SNPs in a population of 1000, for a total of
1,000,000 genotypings, it can cost up to $5 million for a
single project.
For more information regarding various SNP genotyping protocols,
refer to the latest publication from Dr. Pui-Yan Kwok.
Kwok
Pui-Yan. Methods for Genotyping Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms.
Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 2001. 2: 235-258. (view
abstract) |
^ Back to Top
|